The states that have been most active in pursuing the “war on terror” since 2001 are unable to register the connection between their domestic security concerns and their foreign policies argues Paul Rogers.

Washington’s severe problems in Iraq and Afghanistan are leading it to refocus military attention on Tehran argues Paul Rogers.

The demolition of a French empire at Dien Bien Phu is inspiration to a Taliban aiming to erode the resolve of the United States and its allies, says Paul Rogers.

Washington’s bubble of optimism about Iraq has burst. The fallout reveals the contrast between American and jihadi strategic thinking says Paul Rogers.

The uncertain and fragile security situation in Iraq challenges the view that the war is being won, says Paul Rogers.

Two new reports highlight the unavoidable emergency of climate change, writes Paul Rogers, and the key responsibility of governments in taking radical measures to address it.

The narrative of progress in the “war on terror” is belied by immediate events and longer-term trends in Iraq, Afghanistan and Algeria, writes Paul Rogers.

There is an argument over the size of Britain’s military budget, writes Paul Rogers. The real issue is its purpose.

Paul Rogers explores the Cold War origins of the Oxford Research Group and highlights the way ORG is moving forward to become one of the leading organisations developing alternative security approaches and working to address threats such as climate change and marginalisation.

The incontrovertible evidence of global climate change puts a heavy responsibility on civil society as well as governments, writes Paul Rogers: we have five years at most to turn things around.

As we enter the seventh year of the so-called “war on terror”, we face a resurgent Taliban in Afghanistan, a stronger al-Qaida, a more assertive Iran and a humanitarian catastrophe in Iraq. Although U.S. strategy is unlikely to change in the near future, writes Paul Rogers, there is another way.

A season of political deal-making in Islamabad, London and Washington cannot conceal the failings of the “war on terror” at its point of origin, writes Paul Rogers.

Action in Afghanistan, Iraq and potentially Iran have actually bolstered the movement’s presence and power, writes Paul Rogers.

A non-military strategy by elements of the United States government offers slim hope of progress in the war against the Taliban, writes Paul Rogers.

Britain, writes Paul Rogers, needs fresh thinking about national and global security. A key military-political decision by its new prime minister closes the door to it.

The response to the abortive attacks on Britain indicates that space may be opening for fresh debate about the “war on terror”, writes Paul Rogers.

As the seventh year of the war on terror looms, the renowned independent consultancy offers its advice to Britain’s next prime minister, Gordon Brown.

Will the imminent change of political leadership in Britain open the possibility of more enlightened foreign and security policies?

The tensions among Nato member-states over military strategy in Afghanistan complicate the struggle against a reviving Taliban.

The proposed British evacuation of Iraq prefigures the failure of the United States-led project in the country argues Paul Rogers.