Warning: Table './drupal/cache_page' is marked as crashed and should be repaired
query: SELECT data, created, headers, expire FROM cache_page WHERE cid = 'http://www.ukwatch.net/taxonomy/term/3362/feed' in /data/f4/content/ukwatch/public/includes/database.mysql.inc on line 172
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /data/f4/content/ukwatch/public/includes/database.mysql.inc:172) in /data/f4/content/ukwatch/public/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 531
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /data/f4/content/ukwatch/public/includes/database.mysql.inc:172) in /data/f4/content/ukwatch/public/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 532
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /data/f4/content/ukwatch/public/includes/database.mysql.inc:172) in /data/f4/content/ukwatch/public/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 533
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /data/f4/content/ukwatch/public/includes/database.mysql.inc:172) in /data/f4/content/ukwatch/public/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 534 press | ukwatch.net
http://www.ukwatch.net/taxonomy/term/3362
Recent articles by watch area on ukwatch.netenHow the press swallows MoD propaganda
http://www.ukwatch.net/article/how_the_press_swallows_mod_propaganda
<p>Last month the press <a title="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/aug/16/military.afghanistan " href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/aug/16/military.afghanistan" target="_blank">reported</a> how friendly fire in a bungled assault killed a British soldier in Helmand last year. They all neglected to remind their readers, however, how they first reported the operation – as a noble tale of heroism and comradeship.</p>
<p></p>
<p>In January 2007 the British papers went wild over a “<a title="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-429381/Rescue-bid-heroes-strapped-helicopters.html" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-429381/Rescue-bid-heroes-strapped-helicopters.html" target="_blank">Rescue bid by heroes strapped to helicopters</a>“. Describing how British soldiers had tied themselves to the wings of a helicopter to retrive a soldier’s body, an army spokesperson told the <a title="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-429381/Rescue-bid-heroes-strapped-helicopters.html" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-429381/Rescue-bid-heroes-strapped-helicopters.htmlhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-429381/Rescue-bid-heroes-strapped-helicopters.html" target="_blank">Mail</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>“It was a leap into the unknown. It was an extraordinary tale of heroism and bravery of our airmen, soldiers and Marines who were all prepared to put themselves back into the line of fire to rescue a fallen comrade.”</p>
</p></blockquote>
<p></p>
<p>Under the headline “<a title="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/jan/21/afghanistan.world " href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2007/jan/21/afghanistan.world" target="_blank">Heroes of Helmand: the first amazing pictures</a>“, the Observer talked of “a mission that carried echoes of Saving Private Ryan”, “a trip into the unknown, a mercy mission that has already etched itself into contemporary military folklore”.</p>
<p></p>
<p>The <a title="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/jan/17/afghanistan.military" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/jan/17/afghanistan.military" target="_blank">Guardian effused</a> that the mission evoked “the manner of the heroes of the second world war film Flight of the Phoenix”.</p>
<p>The Times had this <a title="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article1293757.ece " href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/article1293757.ece" target="_blank">wonderful line</a>: “Reports said that soldiers from 45 Commando Royal Marines did not want their 30-year-old section commander falling into the hands of insurgents, who they feared <em>would mutilate his body</em>.” Top marks there for demonising the enemy.</p>
<p></p>
<p>The <a title="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1539853/Marines-cling-to-helicopters-to-rescue-comrade.html" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1539853/Marines-cling-to-helicopters-to-rescue-comrade.html" target="_blank">Telegraph reported</a> the operation’s success, followed by an army spokesperson’s words that it showed “the level of camaraderie and bravery of those soldiers involved.”</p>
<p>Now that the full MoD report on the mission is out, however, we learn that it was a tale of “<a title="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/aug/16/military.afghanistan " href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/aug/16/military.afghanistan" target="_blank">poor training, confusion and friendly fire</a>“. In the midst of the chaos, a British gunner had opened fire and shot another soldier dead. “A devastating board of inquiry report released by the Ministry of Defence exposed a catalogue of errors,” said the Guardian.</p>
<p></p>
<p>Of course most papers <a title="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/onthefrontline/2541026/Marine-killed-by-colleague-inquiry-says.html " href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/onthefrontline/2541026/Marine-killed-by-colleague-inquiry-says.html" target="_blank">buried this news</a>, and the Sun managed to tell it as a story of “<a title="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/campaigns/our_boys/article1541794.ece " href="http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/campaigns/our_boys/article1541794.ece" target="_blank">MoD betrayal</a>“.</p>
<p></p>
<p>So – when will the British media learn not to take MoD press releases at face value?</p>
http://www.ukwatch.net/article/how_the_press_swallows_mod_propaganda#commentsMediaTerror/WarAfghanistanpressDave CrouchWed, 17 Sep 2008 23:39:38 +0000Ellie Keen6476 at http://www.ukwatch.net